Rev.
Rali M. Weaver
First
Church and Parish Dedham
ÒEconomic JusticeÓ
2/17/08
In the Fall of 2002, when
I was still a seminarian I was asked to set up a film night at the First Parish
in Portland, Mane (where I was serving as the lay chaplain). The film was a
video of the Ware lecture given at the 2002 General Assembly. The speaker was Canadian Politician and
broadcaster Stephen Henry Lewis who was then serving on the United Nations
Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa.
In his speech he pointed out both the strengths and weaknesses of the
United Nations and shared information about many under publicized events of the
time, including the conflict in Rwanda and the spread of the HIV/AIDS
epidemic. He commented that that
"globalization does not seem able to deal with global problems." And
that "Poverty is increasing and intensifying around the globe."
Stating "half of the people of the world live on less than $750 per
year."
His comments were
mesmerizing and difficult to listen to and as the video completed and I began
to try to facilitate a conversation with those present I quickly realized how
uncomfortable the video had made the audience. ÒHow can this be true?Ó One woman asked. ÒWhat can I
possibly do about it? I didnÕt
know anything about this!Ó
I tried in vain to explain
that the effects of the global economy, the genocide in Rwanda, and the
HIV/AIDS epidemic had been drastically underreported in our country and this is
why I was showing this lecture and this is why Stephen Lewis was speaking
out. But her heart and mind could
not be comforted because to her mind knowledge of the suffering could do no
good if she could do nothing about it.
I bring this incident up
because I believe it illustrates the type of blindness Mary Elizabeth Hobgood
is talking about in our reading today.
It is sometimes (albeit unconsciously) easier to remain blind to the
whole picture- and unwittingly protect our own interests.
And I have been watching
this in our papers recently – the way our government is countering bleak
economic predictions with one solution- by lowering interest rates-- as though
there is only one problem they are responsible to address that is created by
the downturn in our economy.
To be honest I am less
concerned with details of how to fix the problem and more concerned with how
truly blind our governmentÕs solutions seem to be in relation to the suffering
of its citizens. I say this
because as we talk of ÔrecessionÕ we hear no predictions of how this downturn
in our economy affects the work force or social security or any of the social
services that serve the common good.
Just this week in our own
local paper -the Dedham Times- it was reported that the Dedham public school is
having difficulty balancing its budget due to increasing needs for
services for things such as English as a second language
and various Special Education needs. And the Norwood School Board is having a similar
struggle and facing a 100,000-dollar deficit and unable to find places to, in
good conscience, make more cuts.
The needs for special
education are of course close to my heart, because of my many years as a
teacher. From my perspective one
of the first indicators of a bad economy is the rise in need for special
education teachers --because children are often the most affected by the low
wages of their parents. And we see this in an increase of children born with
learning differences and an increase in behavioral issues reported in schools.
But our government is not
mentioning how the rise in fuel costs, the rise in food costs, the rise in
housing costs is affecting our children or our families or the unemployed or
the homeless. We only hear about a plan to lower interest rates.
And it seems impossible
sometimes to get an accurate picture of what is going on in our world. One problem is that for nearly a decade
government programs have reclassified those who have been unemployed for
extended periods as ''not in the labor forceÕÕ so that unemployment numbers
seem lower than they actually are.
And we also know that businesses are relying heavily on temporary
employees to whom they offer no benefits and countless workers are underpaid
and or underinsured and piecing together Part time employment and unable to
make ends meet. And this is not reported in any unemployment records.
But it is reflected in an
increased need to subsidize things such as after-school care and school
breakfasts and lunches. Not to
mention increased traffic to local food pantries and soup kitchens and
shelters.
The economic problems seem
endless and it is difficult to get an entire picture.
How can we see the entire
problem if the media, which we rely so heavily upon, offers only half of the
picture and our government is only addressing a small part of the problem?
What liability we must
accept? For not knowing? For not paying attention? For not
attending to the civil rights of our neighbors? If we fully examine the problems, we can see many dividing
lines, there are race lines and class lines, gender lines, and geographical
dividers.
When I fully examine the
issues in a holistic way it is impossible not to notice that purely because of
the accident of my birth- being born white- being born to educated parents-
that I have some privilege that another born in a different circumstance does
not.
This does not mean I have
not earned the success that I benefit from – but if I only pay attention
to my effort and success I am blind to a big part of the problem.
Last winter when I was in
Guatemala I went to visit a preschool for children who lived near the resort
where I was staying. Many of the children had no shoes, or clean clothes, their
school did not have books and their classrooms had few materials and my tour
guide told us that many of the children spoke only the indigenous language and
could not understand Spanish.
But what struck me immediately was how similar each of those children
were to the ones I was serving at KingÕs Chapel. They liked to draw and play
games. They thought lots of things
I did were funny. And what dawned
on me was that the only real difference between these children in Guatemala and
the ones on Beacon Hill was that one set of children were born in Guatemala and
the other on Beacon Hill.
As adults it is easy to
over look how the accident of our birth has increased our chances for success
and focus solely on our efforts and merit--- because when we fully examine the
privilege of our birth the sense of hopelessness that can be attached to having
what we need when much of the world is suffering can be great. And I would argue that the heart
wrenching truth of the discrepancy between wealth and poverty is what keeps us
all from looking at the issue directly.
But I believe our
spiritual solution is simple.
As many of you know I
served my internship in the First Unitarian Universalist Society of San
Francisco. While there I was able
to take part in several of the Faithful Fools Street Retreats. The Faithful
Fools is program that is part of the mission of the UU Church of San
Francisco. And its purpose is to
serve as a social witness to homelessness in San Francisco. If you arenÕt already familiar with it
Social Witness is concept grounded in the Buddhist concept of
interconnectedness and is an attempt and awakening us.
Basically
what the Faithful Fools do with their Street Retreats is offer people an
opportunity to spend the day or a weekend or a week, on the streets as a
homeless person. I only participated in the daylong retreats. On the day
retreat you walk around the Tenderloin district of San Francisco and eat at one
of the soup kitchens or go hungry, struggle with the same issues as a homeless
person such as where to find a bathroom and how to get out of the rain, and you
would talk to other people on the streets.
At the end of the day the
street retreaters meet and discuss their thoughts and impressions. What came
out of these events was always a sense that the dividing lines between us and
them are imaginary and that there is no real separation between those who have
and those who have not.
A mantra that came out of
one of the first retreats is, I believe, the spiritual solution to our dilemma
of wealth and poverty. The
mantra is this:
What holds us separate,
what keeps us separate. Is not as
much as what still connects us.
As long as we live in the
illusion that were are separate, and hold ourselves as separate the solutions
to injustices will be lost to us.
And it will only be in recognizing our interconnectedness that justice
will be found.
If we are ever to create a
truly just society we must fully examine our individual and collective place of
privilege.
Finding ways to broaden
the conversation to include all voices is the necessary first step in
uncovering the web and building bridges. What we need and what we can do is
form more connections. And this
will set us free.
May it be so